A public meeting was held on a minor variance application submitted by Richard Bilodeau. Jade Koehler presented the application on behalf of Richard Bilodeau. The applicant is seeking a minor variance to permit the construction of an addition to the existing home which would result in a side yard setback of 3.02 meteres. Zoning By-law No. 2021-60 requires a side yard set back of 8 meters.
Director of Community Services advised that the MTO had no objection to the application. The North Bay Mattawa Conservation Authority advised they had no objection to the application in principle, but a file review is required prior to a building permit being issued.
No public input was received at the hearing and the application was approved as requested.
DECISION OF COMMITTEE ON A MINOR VARIANCE APPLICATION
APPLICANT: Richard Bilodeau
CIVIC ADDRESS: 25 Highway 94
FILE NO.: A-2023-11
PURPOSE: The applicant is seeking a minor variance to permit the construction of an addition to the existing home which would result in a side yard setback of 3.02 meters. The applicant is requesting permission to reduce the side yard setback to 3.02 meters whereas Zoning By-law 2021-60 requires a side yard setback of 8 meters
We, the undersigned, in making the decision upon this application have considered whether or not the variance requested was minor and desirable for the appropriate development and use of the land and that the general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law and Official Plan will be maintained.
CONCUR in the following decision and reasons for decision on the 17th day of January, 2024.
DECISION: That the requested variance to reduce the side yard setback to 3.02 meters be approved.
REASONS FOR DECISION:
- The general purpose and intent of the Official Plan is being maintained;
- The general purpose and intent of the Zoning By-law is being maintained;
- The development is desirable and appropriate for the land and consistent with the neighbourhood; and
- The variance is minor in nature.
PUBLIC INFORMATION:
- No public input was received at the public meeting and COA is of the opinion that the proposal is consistent with Provincial Policy, the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law, the development is desirable and appropriate for the land and the variance in minor in nature.